|
A NEW approach on marine protection areas is being put forward following a meeting between the Anglo-Scottish fishing coalition and a number of key organisations.
The coalition has held talks between the Marine Maritime Organisation, Defra, various Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authorities and others which gave it the opportunity to present an alternative approach to marine conservation zones to the one currently being pursued by the government.
The coalition said: "Instead of the four regional projects "faux-stakeholder" approach for marine conservation zones, we proposed that those affected must be at the centre of an authentic dialogue. The aim must be to achieve conservation objectives without displacing fishing vessels from their customary fishing grounds.
"Although the four marine conservation zone regional projects have produced some useful recommendations, the coalition maintain that the current process has failed in four main areas:
* A rushed process leading to poor decisions
* Weak evidence for decisions on site designation and management measures
* Weak coverage of fishing interests representation from those groups potentially affected
* Failure to address the consequences of displacement of fishing activity
"To persist with this approach through to management measures within designated sites would inevitably end up with an adversarial trial of strength. By contrast, the policy suggested by the Coalition offers a consensus-based approach with negotiated and agreed outcomes. The key, according to MPAC, is the close direct involvement of those affected in discussions over site and feature boundaries and appropriate management measures within the sites.
Coalition chairman Dr Stephen Lockwood, said after the meeting: "Whilst, there was some anxiety on the government side about unravelling some of the work on site designation, there did seem to be an appreciation that MPAC’s alternative has obvious merits. There was a commitment to provide a formal response to our ideas and we will discuss that response at our next meeting. We are hopeful that this represents the first step in a process that leads to a genuinely inclusive and participative approach to marine protected areas. We recognise that there is less flexibility in the European Natura sites but our approach has validity here too.
"The weaknesses in the evidence base for SAC and MCZ designation is now well recognised and our approach offers a way in which these uncertainties can be addressed.”
He added: "MPAC continues to expand, with applications from Irish fishing groups and pledges of financial support from processors received since Christmas. International fleets increasingly apprehensive of the consequences for their fishing areas and their lack of representation in project consultations. They recognise MPAC as a platform from which to voice their fears and have their interests represented. Concern for the effects of the government’s MPA process on the future of UK fisheries is also growing among processors who depend on local supplies for their factories. Three companies in the southwest have already committed their backing to MPAC and it is hoped that others will follow."
Should people be 'stimulated' to eat white fish alternatives to cod?
